Authors
Vipul Joshi
Abstract
Ontology has been adapted by the biologists that is widely used in biological and biomedical research which in itself is considered as a mode to constantly interpret characteristics from genotype to phenotype. Artifacts called ontologies in medicinal informatics that have been considerably applied for an extensive time duration to create and deliver governed terminologies for coding arrangements. It is an amalgamation of four chief characteristics that is existent in nearly all ontologies in which success lies: allocation of regular identifiers for courses and associations that characterize the portents present in a domain; allocation of a terminology for a domain; allocation of metadata that defines the proposed connotation of the courses and associations in ontologies; and the allocation of machine-readable adages and descriptions that permit computational entree to some facets of the connotation of courses and associations. In this paper, it is discussed regarding the chief characteristics of ontologies, kinds of gene ontologies and forthcoming fashion of ontologies. Keywords: Ontology, Phenotype, Genotype, Vocabulary
Introduction
Bioinformatics have relatively recent achievement which is Bio-ontologies that determination towards a competent institution and dispersal of living data. Bio-ontologies deliver a structure and organized vocabulary through which data particularly those collected through sequencing and genomics but results are increasing from other types of research. The usage of ontologies initiated in biological sciences about 1998 with the progress of gene ontology. Their attention and action are growing in the zone to value nationwide and worldwide synchronization exertions such as Open Biomedical Ontologies Foundry or National Center for Biomedical Ontologies in 2007. Ontology is referred to as mainly ‘ontologies’ as well as ‘vocabularies’ and ‘thesauri’ that offer numerous key characteristics and these characteristics are used in all their implementations, which is listed below:
• Courses and associations are stated to as identifier like as an Internationalized Resource Identifier (IRI), a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI), or a database identifier string.
• A domain terminology may be a record of expressions linked with the ontology’s courses and associations.
References
“Taking a view on bio-ontologies”. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/694b/5db6306f7a983f64df849ccc7637214bd8d5.pdf
Blake, Judith A., and Carol J. Bult. “Beyond the Data Deluge: Data Integration and Bio-Ontologies.” Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 39, no. 3, 2006, pp. 314–320.
Blake, Judith A., et al. “Gene Ontology: Tool for the Unification of Biology.” 2000 Nature America Inc., vol. 25, May 2000, pp. 25–29.
Bodenreider, Olivier, and Robert Stevens. “Bio-Ontologies: Current Trends and Future Directions.” Briefings in Bioinformatics, vol. 7, no. 3, 2006, pp. 256–274.
Hoehndorf, R., et al. “The Role of Ontologies in Biological and Biomedical Research: a Functional Perspective.” Briefings in Bioinformatics, vol. 16, no. 6, Oct. 2015, pp. 1069–1080.
Huntley, Rachael P, et al. “Understanding How and Why the Gene Ontology and Its Annotations Evolve: the GO within UniProt.” GigaScience, vol. 3, no. 1, 2014.
Leonelli, Sabina. “Bio-Ontologies as Tools for Integration in Biology.” Biological Theory, vol. 3, no. 1, 2008, pp. 7–11.
Malone, James, et al. “Ten Simple Rules for Selecting a Bio-Ontology.” PLOS Computational Biology, vol. 12, no. 2, Nov. 2016.
How to cite this article?
| APA Style | Joshi, V. (2019). A Study of Bio-ontologies. Academic Journal of Bioinformatics, 1(1), 10-13. |
| Chicago Style | |
| MLA Style | |
| DOI | |
| URL |