Authors
Deepshikha Singh, Dr. Lav Kesharwani, A.K. Jain, A.K Gupta
Abstract
Hair is the most frequently found trace evidence in the crime cases. It assists in establishing a relation between a crime scene, a victim and a criminal. Morphology of hair can be helpful in forensic investigations to distinguish hair. In this context for the purpose of analysis, medulla, inner cuticle margin (distinct, indistinct & varied), cuticle thickness & scaling pattern were considered. Five different states (Uttar Pradesh, Kerala, Bengal, Jharkhand and Nagaland) were selected to analyze the structural similarity and dissimilarity from each other. Compound microscope was used for the purpose of observation. There was significant difference between five states of India. The purpose of study was to develop a data base by analyzing the cuticle thickness, inner cuticle margin, medulla, & scaling pattern in human head hair in different states of India to narrow down forensic analysis in crime scene investigation. Keywords: Morphological Features of Hair, Forensic Consideration
Introduction
Hairs are a potentially ubiquitous trace material in several categories of forensic investigation. Hair is a protein filament which grows from follicles and further found in the dermis or skin. Hair is one of the defining features of the mammals. The human body apart from zones of glabrous skin is covered in follicles which produces thick terminal and fine vellus hair. The part beneath the skin is called as the hair follicle or when the same pulled from the skin considered as bulb. The length of hair extends from its root or bulb embedded in the follicle which continues into a shaft of the hair and terminates at a tip. The shaft of the hair is composed of three layers i.e., Cuticle, Cortex and Medulla. Cuticle is considered as the outermost layer of the hair, medulla is known as the innermost layer and cortex is considered as middle layer i.e. in between the cuticle and medulla. Hair is commonly encountered evidence on a crime scene which includes Murder, Homicidal, Sexual assault, accident or many more cases. Different states have different morphological features in hair depending upon their habitat, environment and their eating habits which can resulted into change in their scaling pattern, medulla, cuticle thickness etc. so the hair can be very useful evidence for forensic consideration and interpretation. Several researcher have contributed in this area of work.
References
Bisbing, Richard E (2001) Finding Trace Evidence in Mute Witnesses: Trace Evidence Analysis. Houck Max. (1stedn), Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
Hardey, D (1973) “Quantitative hair form variation in seven populations.” Am J Phys Anthropol 39: 7-17.
Houck, M. M. and Budowle. B. (2002) Correlation of microscopic and mitochondrial DNA hair comparisons, Journal of Forensic Sciences 47:964–967.
Karen A, Lanning, Michaud AL, Bisbing RE, Springer FA, (2009) Scientific Working Group on Materials Analysis Position on Hair Evidence. Journal of Forensic Science 54: 1198-1202.
Khan A, Maryam J, Yaqub T and Nadeem A (2014) “Human Hair Analysis among Four Different Castes Having Potential Application in Forensic Investigation.”Journal of Forensic Res 5: 215.
Kirk PL (1940) Human hair studies: 1. General considerations of hair individualization and its forensic importance. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 31: 486-496.
Montagna, W. (1963) Phylogenetic significance of the skin of man. Arch. Dermatol., Vol. 88, p. 1-19.
Marshall, R.C.; Gillespie1, J.M. and Klement, V. (1985), “Methods and Future Prospects for forensic Identification of Hairs by Electrophoresis.”Journal of the Forensic Science Soceity.vol 52.Pages 57-66.
Moeller MR, Fey P and Sachs H (1993) Hair analysis as evidence in forensic cases. Forensic Sci Int 63: 43-53.
Nataraja Moorthy T and Jessica Marie Roy (2015) Study on Hair Morphology to Distinguish the Dominant Races in Malaysia for Forensic Investigation. Journal of Forensic Science Criminal 3(4): 403. doi: 10.15744/2348-9804.3.403
Nakaki, S., Hino, M. and Miyoshi,M. (2007) “Study of animal species (human, dog and cat) identification using a multiplex single-base primer extension reaction in the cytochromebgene”, Forensic Science International, volume 173, pages 97-102.
Oien CT (2009) Forensic hair comparison: background information for interpretation. FSC 11.
Ogle RR (1998) Individualization of human hair: The role of the hair atlas. The Microscope 46: 17-22.
Parson,W. (1999), “Species identification”, Journal of Forensic Science, Volume 114, pp- 23-28.
Robertson J (1982) An appraisal of the use of microscopic data in the examination of human head hair. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 22:390-395.
Robertson J (1999) Forensic and microscopic examination of human hair. In: Forensic Examination of Hair. Taylor & Francis, London, England, 79-154.
Strauss MAT (1983) Forensic characterization of human hair. The Microscope 31: 15-29.
Verma K, Joshi B (2012) Different Animal Species Hairs as Biological Tool for the Forensic Assessment of Individual Identification Characteristics from Animals of Zoological Park, Pragti Maidan, New Delhi, India. Journal of Forensic Resarch 3: 7.
Williams CS (1938) Aids to the identification of mole and shrew hairs with general comments on hair structure and hair determination. Journal of Wildlife Manag 2: 239-250.
How to cite this article?
| APA Style | Singh, D. et.al., (2018). Comparative Study of Morphological Features of Hair in Five State of India For Forensic Consideration. Academic Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1 (2), 12-21. |
| Chicago Style | |
| MLA Style | |
| DOI | |
| URL |