Anthropological Studies


Review on Sex Determination from Fingerprints

Article Number: LWJ901335 Volume 04 | Issue 01 | April - 2021 ISSN: 2581-4966
08th Mar, 2021
05th Apr, 2021
14th Apr, 2021
29th Apr, 2021

Authors

Nazla Khalid

Abstract

Fingerprints are unique characteristics which helps in positive personal identification. Two fingerprints are never alike, thus one of the best technique for individualization. Fingerprint has been the most commonly encountered trace evidence in scene of crime in the form of latent, patent and plastic prints. Dermatoglyphics is the branch of science related to patterns of ridges on skin. Dermatoglyphics is further divided into qualitative and quantitative. Qualitative Dermatoglyphics encompasses difference in fingerprints patterns and minutiae; whereas, ridge density (RD) and Ridge Count (RC) are incorporated with quantitative study of fingerprints. Epidermal ridge density is determined by means of following: (1) Distance between the ridges and (2) Width of Ridges. Thickness/Width of the epidermal ridges varies among individuals, generally women possess ridges which are fine in contrary to men and, thus, ridge density per given unit of space is greater for female. This form basis for determination of sex from Fingerprints. Researches have conducted the studies among Caucasian–American, Spanish, African–American, Southern Indian and Central Indian populations and similar trend of women having ridge density greater over men is observed. From studies of various researches over the decades, it is proved that ridge density will help the investigators to identify the sex of the perpetrators and thereby eliminate least significant possibilities. Keywords: Fingerprints, Dermatoglyphics, Ridge Density, Sex Determination, Personal Identification, Ridge Width

Introduction

Dermatoglyphics deals with a branch of science related to configurations of dermal ridges on hand and feet (Tikare et. al., 2010). Positive personal identification can be often established from fingerprint, face, teeth, hair, DNA, iris, gait patterns, bones etc. (Karki and Singh, 2014). Identification can be complete (absolute) with complete fixation of the individual or Partial identification which involves ascertainment of specific facts like sex, stature, age etc. regarding an individual (Kapoor and Badiye, 2015). Fingerprints are best to establish the identity owing to its non-invasive and cost effective characteristics. Two fingers will never have identical prints, even monozygotic twins. (Kapoor, 2015; Nayak et al., 2010; Tandon et al., 2017). Fingerprints involves the unique arrangement of furrows and grooves in distal phalanges of fingers (Nabar, 46–52). The science of identification through the examination of fingerprints - Dactyloscopy is devised by Harold Cummins in 1926 (Tandon et al., 2017; Kapoor and Badiye, 2015). Dermal ridges and craniofacial structures are both formed during 5–7th week of intra‐uterine life and are completed by 21-24th week (6-month foetal life) (Tikare et. al., 2010; Sharma et al., 2018; Kapoor and Badiye, 2015). The ridges are thus permanent and are lost through decomposition after death (Sharma et al., 2018). The overall fingerprint characteristic is affected by genetics and environmental factors; thus useful for the diagnosis of congenital malformations (Sharma et al., 2018; Maltoni, 512–13). The genetic code in DNA gives general instructions on the way skin should form in a developing foetus and the specific way it forms is a result of random, influenced by the flow of amniotic fluid, the position of the foetus in the uterus etc (Maltoni, 512–13). This result in uniqueness of the fingerprints. The fingerprints remain permanent and unaltered except in scenarios of injuries of cuts, bruises and burns, however, it is restored once healed (Karki and Singh, 2014; Soanboon et al., 2015).

Dactyloscopy has developed over time. Initially, it was used in ancient Babylonia to mark business transactions. Today fingerprints are the most preferred to biometric security devices and an important scientific evidence in courts throughout the world (Gunas et al., 2018). The foundations for Modern Fingerprint Identification were established by the studies of Sir Francis Galton (Father of Fingerprint) and Sir Edward Henry at the end of the 19th century. F. Galton put forth Dalton details or minutiae and minimum minutiae required to establish a perfect match. Sir E. Henry contributed to the formation of the “Primary classification of fingerprints” (Rao et al., 2008; MHA, Government of India, 2016).

References

Acree, Mark A. “Is There a Gender Difference in Fingerprint Ridge Density?” Forensic Science International, vol. 102, no. 1, 1999, pp. 35–44. Crossref, doi:10.1016/s0379-0738(99)00037-7.

Gunas, V. І., et al. “Palmar Dermatoglyphics of Modern Ukrainians: Regional Trends.” Biomedical and Biosocial Anthropology, no. 31, 2018, pp. 11–17. Crossref, doi:10.31393/bba31-2018-02.

Gutiérrez-Redomero, Esperanza, et al. “Variability of Fingerprint Ridge Density in a Sample of Spanish Caucasians and Its Application to Sex Determination.” Forensic Science International, vol. 180, no. 1, 2008, pp. 17–22. Crossref, doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.06.014.

Jantz, Richard L. “Sex and Race Differences in Finger Ridge-Count Correlations.” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 46, no. 1, 1977, pp. 171–76. Crossref, doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330460122.

Kapoor, Neeti, and Ashish Badiye. “Digital Dermatoglyphics: A Study on Muslim Population from India.” Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 5, no. 3, 2015, pp. 90–95. Crossref, doi:10.1016/j.ejfs.2014.08.001.

Kapoor, Neeti, and Ashish Badiye. “Sex Differences in the Thumbprint Ridge Density in a Central Indian Population.” Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, 2015, pp. 23–29. Crossref, doi:10.1016/j.ejfs.2014.05.001.

Karki, RK, and PK Singh. “Gender Determination from Fingerprints.” Journal of Universal College of Medical Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, 2014, pp. 12–15. Crossref, doi:10.3126/jucms.v2i1.10484.

Krishan, Kewal, et al. “Sex Differences in Fingerprint Ridge Density – Causes and Further Observations.” Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, vol. 17, no. 3, 2010, pp. 172–73. Crossref, doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2009.12.003.

Maltoni, Davide. “Fingerprint Recognition, Overview.” Encyclopedia of Biometrics, 2009, pp. 510–13. Crossref, doi:10.1007/978-0-387-73003-5_47.

MHA, Government of India, “Finger Prints in India- 2016 Pdf.” NCRB New Delhi, 2016.

Nabar, BS. Forensic Science in Criminal Investigation, 2nd ed., Asia Law House, 2015, pp. 46–52.

Nayak, Vinod C., et al. “Sex Differences from Fingerprint Ridge Density in the Indian Population.” Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, vol. 17, no. 2, 2010, pp. 84–86. Crossref, doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2009.09.002.

Okajima, M. “Frequency of Forks in Epidermal-Ridge Minutiae in the Finger Print.” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 32, no. 1, 1970, pp. 41–48. Crossref, doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330320106.

Rao GS et al, “A Novel Fingerprints Identification System Based on The Edge Detection.” International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, vol. 8, no. 12, 2008, pp 394-397.

Sharma, Anu, et al. “Dermatoglyphics: A Review on Fingerprints and Their Changing Trends of Use.” Chrismed Journal of Health and Research, vol. 5, no. 3, 2018, pp. 167–72, doi:10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_112_17.

Sehgal, V. N. “Forensic Science & Its Related Issues.” A, 2011, Selective & Scientific Books, 2012, pp. 129–45.

Soanboon, Pattanawit, et al. “Determination of Sex Difference from Fingerprint Ridge Density in Northeastern Thai Teenagers.” Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 6, no. 2, 2016, pp. 185–93. Crossref, doi:10.1016/j.ejfs.2015.08.001.

Tandon, Aanchal, et al. “Estimation of Gender Using Cheiloscopy and Dermatoglyphics.” National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 8, no. 2, 2017, p. 102. Crossref, doi:10.4103/njms.njms_2_17.

Thakar, Mukesh Kumar, et al. “Validation Studies on Gender Determination from Fingerprints with Special Emphasis on Ridge Characteristics.” Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, 2018. Crossref, doi:10.1186/s41935-018-0049-7.

Tikare, S et al. “Dermatoglyphics--a Marker for Malocclusion?.” International Dental Journal vol. 60,4 (2010): 300-4.

How to cite this article?

APA StyleKhalid, N. (2021). Review on Sex Determination from Fingerprints. Academic Journal of Anthropological Studies, 04(01), 12–17.
Chicago Style
MLA Style
DOI
URL

Create Your Password

We've sent a link to create password on your registered email, Click the link in email to start using Xournal.

Sign In

Forgot Password?
Don't have an account? Create Account

Create Account

Already have an account? Sign In

Forgot Password

Do you want to try again? Sign In

Publication Tracking