Anthropological Studies


Variations in the Palatal Rugae Patterns in Indian Populations – A Need for a Multi-Centric or Multi-Regional Study under Forensic Context

Article Number: EBK572522 Volume 05 | Issue 01 | April - 2022 ISSN: 2581-4966
31st Aug, 2021
25th Nov, 2021
21st Mar, 2022
13th Apr, 2022

Authors

Dr. Divya Mandalaywala, Dr. Jayasankar P. Pillai

Abstract

Palatal rugae are the anatomical mucosal elevations that are seen in the anterior hard palate. Palatal rugae number and their patterns are not uniform in all individuals, they appear to vary in several population subsets. They are associated with variations in different regions of India and can aid as an additional tool in forensic identification procedures. Palatal rugae studies are being reported from different parts of India. It have been observed that qualitative and quantitative variations occur in palatal rugae among several populations subsets in India. Variations which are gender based in the palatal rugae have also been reported in the literature. This article reviews the pattern of variations seen in palatal rugae in different geographic locations in India as reported in the scientific literature. It is observed that the population in the Southern part of India has shown dominance in wavy patterns, whereas, in Northern and central India, the straight pattern was more common. Rugae patterns are considered as important anatomic markers in forensic human identification, large-scale multi-centric research is required to validate palatal rugae features in discriminating population (groups) in India. Thus in situations of mass disaster, the soft tissue component like rugae may be an addendum to the dental features in identifying human remains. Keywords: Geographical Variations, Palatal Rugae, Population Variation, Rugoscopy, Forensic Human Identification

Introduction

India is a land of diversity known for its variety of cultures, religions, and languages. As we move from north to south and west to east we find differences in ethnicity, secularity, heritage, and experience. Geographical diversity in India is well known across the world. Variations and diversities exist all along with the country. Considering the aspects of dentistry, an anterior third of the hard palate has a significant anatomic landmark, palatal rugae which have noticeable anatomic variations among various geographical population groups (Byatnal et al., 2014).

Palatal rugae are defined as irregular and non-identical mucosal elevations that are seen on the anterior one-third of the palate. They run in a transverse direction on either side of the mid palatine raphe (Banker et al., 2016). They are protected by lips, a buccal pad of fat, and teeth (Nanci, 2003). The number and patterns of palatal rugae vary in all individuals and also in various population subsets. ‘Palatoscopy or Rugoscopy term is used for studying palatal rugae which were first proposed by Trobo Hermosa, a Spanish investigator.

The rugae patterns are relatively unique in an individual and are known to be stable throughout the lifetime after the completion of growth. They retain their anatomic details even in the burn victims and during taphonomic decompositions to a certain extent (Muthusubramanian et al., 2005). Thus, they can be used for successful post-mortem identification provided there is a pre-existing antemortem record. In orthodontic treatments, the position of the rugae changes after the maxillary expansion, while the shape and number remain unchanged (Shailaja et al., 2018). However, the stability of the palatal rugae during and after that orthodontic treatment remains a topic of debate, especially when applied under a forensic context (Deepak et al., 2014). There are several studies done on palatal rugae patterns in the Indian population from different states. The review of the literature in this area is done and after compiling the results from those studies, conclusions have been drawn in this article.

Classification of the Palatal Rugae

The Palatal rugae classification which is widely accepted was given by Thomas and Kotze in the year 1983. They classified rugae based on unification pattern, length, shape and direction. Individual rugae length is measured transversely from its start point at the mid-palatine raphe to its endpoint. Primary rugae: 5–10 mm, Secondary rugae: 3–5 mm, Fragmentary rugae: <3 mm. According to shape, they are classified as Straight - terminates in the straight line; Curved- has a crescent shape and a gradual curve; wavy- serpentine shape of rugae; Circular- continuous ring formation. The direction of rugae is seen by the angle formed between a line joining origin and the termination of rugae concerning the mid- palatine raphe. Forward-rugae have positive angles in respect to MPR; Backwards-angles are negative with respect to MPR; Horizontal- if the angle is zero to MPR; Perpendicular- the rugae that run parallel to MPR. The term “Unification” is used when the two rugae join at their origin or insertion. When two rugae begin from the same origin but bifurcate transversely are called Diverging rugae; whereas, converging are the ones in which rugae with different origins joins on their lateral positions (Pillai et al., 2016).

The palatal rugae, in most of the studies, were analyzed using the dental models (Indira et al., 2012).

The application of advanced digital technologies like digital photographs of the models and 3D digital scanning of dental models are also being tried to analyze rugAe patterns (Santos et al., 2011; Mohammed et al., 2013; Bavaresco et al., 2020; Taneva et al., 2015).

References

Anjum, A. Shamaa, and Thenmozhi MS. "Determination of Sex using Prints of Palatal Rugae." Drug Invention Today, Nov 2018, Vol. 10 Issue 11, p2284-228810.

Banker, Alka, et al. “Quantitative and Transverse Changes in the Position of Palatal Rugae after Palatal Expansion.” Dentistry, vol. 6, no. 7, 2016. Crossref, doi:10.4172/2161-1122.1000387.

Bavaresco, Danubia et al. “Morphology of the Palatal Rugae before and after Orthodontic Treatment with and without rapid Maxillary Expansion and Dental Extractions.” Indian Journal of Dental Research : Official Publication of Indian Society for Dental Research vol. 31, 2 (2020): 241-246. doi:10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_12_19

Byatnal, Amit, et al. “Palatoscopy: An Adjunct to Forensic Odontology: A Comparative Study among Five Different Populations of India.” Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine, vol. 5, no. 1, 2014, p. 52. Crossref, doi:10.4103/0976-9668.127287.

Deepak, V et al. “Palatal Rugae patterns in Orthodontically treated cases, are they a reliable Forensic Marker?” Journal of International Oral Health : JIOH vol. 6,5 (2014): 89-95.

Indira, Annamalai Ponnuswamy et al. “Mandibular ramus: An Indicator for Sex Determination - A Digital Radiographic Study.” Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences vol. 4,2 (2012): 58-62. doi:10.4103/0975-1475.109885.

Kaur, Jaswinder, et al. "Subjective and Quantifiable Analysis of Palatal Rugae Pattern in Punjab Population." University Journal of Dental Sciences, Vol. 7, no. 1, Mar. 2021, doi:10.21276/10.21276/ujds.2021.7.1.7.

Mohammed, Rezwana Begum, et al. “Rugoscopy: Human Identification by Computer-Assisted Photographic Superimposition Technique.” Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, 2013, p. 90. Crossref, doi:10.4103/0975-1475.119771.

Muthusubramanian, M et al. “Analysis of Rugae in Burn Victims and Cadavers to simulate rugae identification in cases of Incineration and Decomposition.” The Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology vol. 23,1 (2005): 26-9.

Nanci, Antonio. Ten Cate’s Oral Histology: Development, Structure, and Function. Elsevier, 2003. 299-328.

Nayak, Preethi, et al. “Differences in the Palatal Rugae Shape in Two Populations of India.” Archives of Oral Biology, vol. 52, no. 10, 2007, pp. 977–82. Crossref, doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.04.006.

Paliwal, Aparna, et al. “Palatal Rugoscopy: Establishing Identity.” Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, 2010, p. 27. Crossref, doi:10.4103/0974-2948.71054.

Pillai, Jayasankar, et al. “Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Palatal Rugae Patterns in Gujarati Population: A Retrospective, Cross-Sectional Study.” Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, vol. 8, no. 3, 2016, p. 126. Crossref, doi:10.4103/0975-1475.195110.

Pramanik, Asutosh, et al. “A Comparative Study of Gender Difference in Palatal Rugae Patterns among Bengali Subjects in Murshidabad.” International Journal of Anatomy, Radiology and Surgery, vol. 8, no. 1, Jan. 2019, pp. 6–10., https://doi.org/10.7860/IJARS/2019/36281:2449.

Rath, Rachna, and BAjay Reginald. “Palatal Rugae: An Effective Marker in Population Differentiation.” Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, vol. 6, no. 1, 2014, p. 46. Crossref, doi:10.4103/0975-1475.127771.

Santos, Karen Christine Dos, et al. “Evaluation of a Digital Methodology for Human Identification Using Palatal Rugoscopy.” Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, vol. 10, no. 3, 2011, pp. 199–203, docplayer.net/5058467-Evaluation-of-a-digital-methodology-for-human-identification-using-palatal-rugoscopy.html.

Savita, JK, et al. “Prevalence of Palatal Rugae Shapes in Karnataka and Kerala Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.” Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry, vol. 6, no. 3, 2016, p. 230. Crossref, doi:10.4103/2231-0762.183113.

Selvamani, Manickam, et al. “Dimensional and Morphological Analysis of Various Rugae Patterns in Kerala (South India) Sample Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.” Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine, vol. 6, no. 2, 2015, p. 306. Crossref, doi:10.4103/0976-9668.159985.

Shailaja, A M et al. “Assessment of Palatal Rugae Pattern and its Significance in Orthodontics and Forensic Odontology.” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology: JOMFP vol. 22,3 (2018): 430-435. doi:10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_190_18.

Shanmugam, Shankar, et al. “Palatal Rugae in Population Differentiation between South and North Indians: A Discriminant Function Analysis.” Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, 2012, p. 75. Crossref, doi:10.4103/0975-1475.109890.

Surekha, R., et al. “Assessment of Palatal Rugae Patterns in Manipuri and Kerala Population.” Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, 2012, p. 93. Crossref, doi:10.4103/0975-1475.109896.

Taneva, EmiliaD, et al. “3D Evaluation of Palatal Rugae for Human Identification Using Digital Study Models.” Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, vol. 7, no. 3, 2015, p. 244. Crossref, doi:10.4103/0975-1475.172451.

How to cite this article?

APA StyleMandalaywala, D., & Pillai, J. P. (2022). Variations in the Palatal Rugae Patterns in Indian Populations – A Need for a Multi-Centric or Multi-Regional Study under Forensic Context. Academic Journal of Anthropological Studies, 5(1), 29–34.
Chicago Style
MLA Style
DOI
URL

Create Your Password

We've sent a link to create password on your registered email, Click the link in email to start using Xournal.

Sign In

Forgot Password?
Don't have an account? Create Account

Create Account

Already have an account? Sign In

Forgot Password

Do you want to try again? Sign In

Publication Tracking